AI Website Builds & WordPress→AI-Platform Migrations
Ship client sites in days, and never trust the builder's word for it.
What was getting in the way.
Client site builds and rebuilds were the marketing team’s longest lead-time deliverable, weeks of design/dev cycles, and migrating a WordPress site to modern hosting risked breaking the thing that pays for everything: tracking and lead attribution. Builder tools self-report "done" whether or not the work is actually right.
Context
E.g., a childcare/play-care business, a dog-training company, a summer camp: local service businesses whose sites moved to AI-platform hosting.
How the work runs.
- 01
Trigger
a new site build, revision round, or migration is assigned.
- 02
Agent sends one consolidated build
Agent sends one consolidated build brief to the AI site-builder platform (batched changes, explicit "never invent facts" ground rules).
- 03
Monitors the build (long passes
Monitors the build (long passes run 15+ minutes), approves plans, and handles the builder's quirks (timeouts that actually delivered, stale deploys).
- 04
Deploys explicitly and waits out
Deploys explicitly and waits out CDN propagation, confirming the new build is actually being served.
- 05
Independently QAs the live site
DOM scan of every key page for forbidden content (placeholders, invented prices/testimonials), plus close-up vision inspection of every image for AI artifacts (hands, faces, garbled text): the builder's own claims are never accepted.
- 06
For migrations
builds a full URL map, extracts and re-verifies every tracking tag against platform APIs (analytics, ads, call tracking), and runs a phased DNS cutover with a pre/post checklist.
- 07
Outcome
a live, tracking-intact site verified end-to-end by a second set of (agent) eyes.
Evidence from the workflow.
Each system has a role.
Action
AI site-builder platform
Signal (tag verification)
Web analytics / ad platform / call tracking
Action
DNS / hosting
Record of truth
Site database (leads)
Why this is Coworker.
Takes assignments and reports back. You hand it work, it prepares and returns a result.
- 01
DNS cutovers follow a phased checklist with a human in the loop; the builder is never allowed to invent facts (prices, reviews, credentials): briefs state it and QA enforces it.
Impact / Outcomes
Site builds that took weeks now iterate in same-day revision rounds.
One migrated client site's database shows 311 captured leads, pulled live from the site's own lead table, not estimated.
Independent image/DOM QA has repeatedly caught defects the builder claimed it had inspected and passed.
Find where a workflow like this fits.
Start with the systems, work, constraints, and authority already present in your operation.